home
1. The charges documented
Did the arraignment commit an error in indexing a second-degree homicide indictment against Zimmerman?
"I suppose the issue was they cheated it in the exact starting," said Holly Hughes, a criminal barrier legal counselor who was not on Zimmerman's lawful group. Had prosecutors begun with the murder accusation, the conclusion may have been distinctive, she told CNN.
Yet Florida State Attorney Angela Corey said the claims "possess all the necessary qualities" for the second-degree homicide allegation.
Photographs: Zimmerman trial Photos: Zimmerman trial
Resistance: Prosecution was "shocking"
Photographs: Reaction to Zimmerman verdict Photos: Reaction to Zimmerman verdict
Second-degree homicide is outlined as a killing did with scorn, malevolence or spite, yet is not planned. To convict Zimmerman of homicide, attendants might have needed to accept he "deliberately dedicated a demonstration or acts that made the expiration of Trayvon Martin."
A verdict and more: Get made up for lost time
Inquiries surfaced about if the charge was suitable on the grounds that knowing an individual's feeling throughout a slaughtering is challenging to demonstrate.
Therefore, the indictment needed to depend on the confirmation to tell the story of what happened and what prompted the shooting, HLN's Ryan Smith said.
Without a richness of confirmation, demonstrating the case was troublesome for both sides.
Previous Los Angeles County prosecutor Loni Coombs underscored that members of the jury did not find Zimmerman pure; rather, they discovered him not blameworthy. There's a contrast, she told CNN's Don Lemon.
"They're not truism he's pure, they're trying to say they couldn't demonstrate past a sensible mistrust, and accordingly the law gave them no decision yet to compose 'not guilty,'" Coombs said.
--Trial days: 14
--Exhibits: More than 200.
--Total number of witnesses called to the stand: 56.
--911 calls played in the court: Three (Zimmerman made a call to the non-crisis line).
--Statements about the shooting made by Zimmerman: Seven.
--Number of attendants who chose Zimmerman's destiny: Six --all ladies; five are white and one is black/hispanic.
2. The confirmation put forth
Zimmerman's record of what happened the night of the shooting was a focal part of the trial. He was the main living individual who saw the whole episode, and there wasn't much physical proof for either group to fall once again on.
Different unfavorable conditions played into the starting examination that night: A dull, stormy scene isn't perfect for a murder examination, says HLN law authorization investigator Mike Brooks.
Much was made throughout the trial concerning why there was so minimal guilt on Martin and Zimmerman, who said he terminated in self preservation since he was being whipped and dreaded for his existence.
Dr. Vincent Di Maio, a previous medicinal inspector in San Antonio and a master on discharge wounds, affirmed that the drizzle could have washed away and influenced proof gathered from Martin's hands.
Lawyer Faith Jenkins said it doesn't make a difference what a prosecutor accepts provided that he or she doesn't have sufficient proof.
"Trials are possibly about reality constantly," the previous prosecutor told CNN. "It's about what you can demonstrate in court."
There was so small proof accessible that the resistance assemble an enlivened movie to re-institute the occasions of that night dependent upon witness proclamations, police reports and Zimmerman's record, they said.
The judge led against the utilization of the movie.
Zimmerman could at present be considered answerable for Martin's expiration
3. The teenager who spoke to Martin
She was on the telephone with Martin minutes before he was shot and was recognized a nexus indictment witness. In any case Rachel Jeantel at first opposed approaching.
Father, offspring respond to Zimmerman verdict
"She would like to get included in this in no way that is available," Martin family counselor Benjamin Crump told correspondents Saturday.
Martin attorney: 'we must all be peaceful'
Throughout two days of affirmation that was now and again strained and confrontational, Jeantel depicted her discussion with Martin.
The point when barrier law advocate Don West tested her story, prescribing Martin ambushed Zimmerman, she reacted: "That's impeded."
Jeantel affirmed that Martin let her know he was being pursued by an "unpleasant a** wafer."
"This was a catastrophe," criminal barrier attorney Mark Geragos told CNN's Anderson Cooper the day Jeantel affirmed. "This was the star witness, the star witness. The wheels fell off and it was a train wreck. Furthermore there's no other --it is highly unlikely to delicate pedal it."
Dissection: The race element
4. The voice on the call
The moms of Zimmerman and Martin every affirmed that screeches for help heard on a 911 call the night of the shooting were those of her child.
Whose voice was heard on the call was acknowledged key for both the indictment and protection in demonstrating who was answerable for the shooting. Assuming that the shrieks were Martin's, as the indictment fought, Zimmerman was the attacker. Provided that the screeches were Zimmerman's, as the protection said, Martin was the attacker.
On July 5, in a stuffed court, the indictment played the recording for Martin's mother, Sybrina Fulton.
The point when inquired as to whether she distinguished the voice, Fulton said it fit in with "Trayvon Benjamin Martin."
Hours after the fact, the protection called Gladys Zimmerman to the stand, where she affirmed the voice shrieking for help fit in with her child.
"I know since he's my child," she said.
Therefore, there was no complete respond in due order regarding hearers.
5. Affirmation
The lead investigator in the case, Chris Serino, was called to the stand by the indictment.
Serino told the court that he accepted Zimmerman exaggerated the amount of times he was hit that night yet didn't feel any "dynamic misleading."
"It is possible that he was coming clean or he was a complete obsessive liar," he affirmed.
Home
Post a Comment